Benjamin Berg <bberg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 2022-03-09 at 12:35 -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote: > >> Speaking of which, what *are* we expected to do? Aleksei on IRC >> suggested that the preferred solution is to swap the BuildRequires to >> pkgconfig(libusb) - is that right? Is this going to stick around, or is >> it going away too? > > Ideally you should switch BuildRequires to pkgconfig(libusb-1.0) I > would say. Many packages will support building against the newer libusb > API just fine. The libusb (now libusb-compat-0.1) package is just a > small wrapper library that bridges some API differences. Thanks for the clarification (and assistance investigating)! Be well, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
