On 03.03.22 15:30, Michael J Gruber wrote:
So, I explicitely asked what your plan was and got no response. I suggested to fix the problem at the root package and you went ahead rebuilding depending packages. I asked you to use proper commit messages/changelog if you do and got a series of "Rebuild (leptonica)", "Bump as F36 needs another rebuild" and what not. I asked you to at least reference the bz entries and you did not. While I'm typing this a buildroot override comes along. We do have an "unresponsive maintainer" process. Do we have an "unresponsive irreponsible proven packager" process, too?
To be honest I'm saddened by such hostility. I maintain a pretty large number of packages mostly in my free time, and I think it's fair to say that I maintain most of the mingw and stack alone. I undertook a pretty large effort to merge some mingw specs into the native specs reduce my workload in the future, often working late into the night. At one point I did 197 commits in one day, and for as much effort and concentration I put into it, mistakes do happen - I am only human. But I think I've always been responsive and taken care to address any issues in a timely matter. So honestly, rather than attacking people for commit messages and attacking me for "the problems I caused last time", you might might consider using a more friendly tone.
Sandro _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
