Re: Possibly unexpcted soname change: liblept.so.5 -> libleptonica.so.5.4.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 25.02.22 11:37, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> 
> Apologies, my mistake, upstream uses different library names depending 
> on whether you build with autotools or cmake, and when switching to 
> cmake I accidentally only provided the compat symlink for the 
> unversioned link library, but not for the versioned library. I'll 
> rebuild affected packages.
> 
> Sandro

So, is your plan to create the "lept" compat symlink both versioned and unversioned? No need to rebuild affected packages then. They have been rebuilt during the mass rebuild successfully and FTI now (not FTBFS).

Also, if you do decide to rebuild as a proven packager:
May I ask you to use more descriptive commit messages than "Rebuild (tesseract)" and close bugs that you caused (referencing them in the bodhi update could help) and maybe correspond with maintainers of affected packages in some way (i.e. do it better than the last time this happened)?

Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux