Re: Chromium security bugs remain unfixed for > 1 month

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/1/22 16:02, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It 
> hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs fixed 
> upstream. At the very least, Chromium on Fedora is vulnerable to the 
> following:
> 
> CVE-2022-0452: Use after free in Safe Browsing.
> CVE-2022-0453: Use after free in Reader Mode.
> CVE-2022-0454: Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE.
> CVE-2022-0455: Inappropriate implementation in Full Screen Mode.
> CVE-2022-0456: Use after free in Web Search.
> CVE-2022-0457: Type Confusion in V8.
> CVE-2022-0458: Use after free in Thumbnail Tab Strip.
> CVE-2022-0459 Use after free in Screen Capture.
> CVE-2022-0603: Use after free in File Manager.
> CVE-2022-0604: Heap buffer overflow in Tab Groups.
> CVE-2022-0605: Use after free in Webstore API.
> CVE-2022-0606: Use after free in ANGLE.
> CVE-2022-0607: Use after free in GPU.
> CVE-2022-0608: Integer overflow in Mojo.
> CVE-2022-0609: Use after free in Animation.
> 
> Google reports these as being actively exploited in the wild, which means:
> 
> ** If you use Chromium on Fedora, stop using it NOW **
> 
> Can we fix this situation somehow? Browsers are the most critical thing 
> to get security updates as fast as possible. Having bugs unfixed for a 
> month that are exploited in the wild is *bad* and puts our users at 
> serious risk.
> 
> RPMFusion seems to push timely updates - can we reuse that? Should users 
> be pointed towards RPMFusion instead in the meantime?

What are the differences between the RPMFusion SRPM and the
Fedora SRPM?

> Thoughts?

I wound up using proprietary Google Chrome on Debian for this reason.
I use Qubes OS so using different OSs for different tasks is trivial.

The only distribution I know of that seems to promptly ship updates to
Chromium is Arch, which does not insist on only shipping free software.
Could the difference be that Arch and RPMFusion can directly use the
tarball provided by upstream, whereas Fedora and Debian cannot?

Tom Callaway, what is the hardest part for you?

-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux