Denis Fateyev wrote: > Unfortunately, the shared library support is explicitly removed by the > upstream: > https://github.com/msharov/ustl/issues/100#issuecomment-1040553883 > https://github.com/msharov/ustl/commit/7366ab143d9bd0f48c59931c0c58529eb5179c27 This is just lame. I do not understand the explanation at all, since I do not see any scenario in which the static library makes things easier for the consumer of the library. I have added a commit comment saying so. And the fact that the library building code is handwritten is a WTF by itself. With any reasonable build system, changing a library from static to shared is at most a one-line change. But upstream's build system is not reasonable. > As an alternative, I can orphan the "ustl" package in rawhide — I haven't > checked yet, but suspect that it's not used by other packages nowadays. Well, if that is the case, considering that upstream themselves consider the library obsolete, I guess it is fine to orphan it and let it be retired eventually. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
