Rpm: provide a static library in package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello all,

The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently switched from providing a shared library to a static library.

So I'm going to make changes in the package, and provide everything in "-devel" subpackage.
I have looked through https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries requirements — but there are some questions left.

1) Should I preserve debug information for the static library during build, so the library can be stripped and debug packages can be created? Or, can I just skip  debug package creation with  "%global debug_package %{nil}" ?
I know it's acceptable for header-only, but not sure for packages with binary static libraries.

2) Can I use the stripping LDFLAGS option ("-s") right during the static package build, not to strip anything after build? Or, let the built library be stripped in terms of RPM package flow?

Thanks!

--
wbr, Denis.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux