Re: CVE's and older versions of software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:26:54 -0500
"Steven A. Falco" <stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2/17/22 09:58 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > This is covered by the Updates Policy[1]. There is quite a bit written there about why an incompatible update might or might not be allowed in a stable release. It also specifically addresses security updates[2], and describes how you can petition FESCo for an exception, either for a particular update or as a blanket exception for your package.
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#_exceptions
> > 
> > [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#security-fixes
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the links.  I've opened an issue [1].
> 
> [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2762

personally I consider KiCad as the kind of application where I would not
like to get a major upgrade potentially breaking my work during a
lifetime of a Fedora release


		Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux