Re: CVE's and older versions of software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 14:20 -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 2/16/22 01:58 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 13:53:04 -0500
> > "Steven A. Falco" <stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > There are some CVE's against KiCad that have been fixed in the latest version, namely KiCad 6.0.2.  I've built that for F36 and Rawhide.
> > > 
> > > I have not released KiCad 6.0.2 into Fedora 34 and 35, because my understanding is that by policy, we don't generally allow "major version" updates in stable Fedora releases.  Thus F34 and F35 still ship KiCad 5.1.12, which is affected by the CVE's.
> > > 
> > > I could easily build KiCad 6.0.2 for F34 / F35 - in fact, I have done so in the KiCad Copr repository.
> > > 
> > > So, should this situation be an exception to the policy of "no major version changes in a stable release"?
> > 
> > as often, it depends :-)
> > 
> > - what's the severity level of the CVEs?
> > - does KiCad 6 come with substantial changes like UI redesign,
> > compatibility issues with previous release, etc?
> 
> The vulnerability is rated as "7.8 - CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", whatever that means. :-)
> 
> Basically, attempting to read a malicious file can cause a buffer overflow, and then execute malicious code.
> 
> KiCad is not suid, so the risk would be to an individual user rather than the whole system.
> 
> KiCad 6 does have UI changes and files it creates cannot be read by KiCad 5 or earlier.
> 
> I contacted upstream, and I know what patches form a part of the solution, but they don't apply cleanly to KiCad 5.  I might be able to sort them out...

The 'ideal' solution is to backport the security fix, yes. If you're
not able to do this, or find anyone else who can do it for you, I guess
it kinda becomes a judgment call whether fixing the security issue is
"worth" the compatibility problems. I don't think we have a definite
guide/policy to what to do if the optimal solution isn't practical,
here?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux