Re: F37 Change: Make pkexec and pkla-compat optional (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Splitting them off but making them Recommended seems odd to me. At that
> point we've got all the work of splitting them but little of the
> benefit, because soft dependencies are included when building images,
> so our default installs are still going to include pkexec.
> 
> Why not just not have them recommended at all, and instead try to find
> all packages that use them and add dependencies, so that they will be
> included when an image or whatever really does need them? Is that
> considered too difficult?

I went with Recommends to be conservative. We could indeed make them fully optional if we end up being confident we will not break the default user experience.

--
Timothée Ravier
CoreOS engineer & Fedora Kinoite maintainer
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux