On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 03:55 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote: > Interesting, I notice the greater latency you mention on FC4 compared > with FC3, but for some reason the older pilot-link is more tolerant of > the increased delay. I am using a locally built-from-SRPM on FC4 > version of pilot-link-0.11.8-3 which has a patch to enable the Perl > bindings (which I need for SyncBBDB). Have you tried rebuilding the > earlier binaries from the last FC3 SRPM on your new FC4 installation > and using them? Yes. Also using the FC3 binary rpm directly, and using a static linked FC3 pilot-xfer. There is a narrow window which I can hit now I know I am aiming for getting to /dev/ttyUSB1 as early as possible with any of those. I have only been attempting to get it working at all so just using the list function - rather than seriously using pilot-xfer to do work. Personally I think that we should just drop everything back down to a 0.11.x pilot-tools release and use a tool chain which basically works throughout - although it will be painful to release a down-reved update due to packaging side effects. Maybe I should open a bug against udev/hotplug to see why things are so damn slow now. Nigel. -- [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list