Re: gnome-pilot patches need applying

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "NM" == Nigel Metheringham  writes:

[...]

NM> Actualy that doesn't work for me either - see
NM> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161058

NM> It basically looks like being a problem down to the udev/hotplug
NM> mechanism taking so long to get around to build the devices (on a
NM> 2 year old laptop with reasonable memory load) that the palm has
NM> got bored and stopped sending initiation messages by the time you
NM> can connect to the new devices.

NM> By putting a static device in place I can make this stuff work
NM> reliably.  Not tried venturing near gnome-pilot yet - I know that
NM> stuff is broken.

Interesting, I notice the greater latency you mention on FC4 compared
with FC3, but for some reason the older pilot-link is more tolerant of
the increased delay.  I am using a locally built-from-SRPM on FC4
version of pilot-link-0.11.8-3 which has a patch to enable the Perl
bindings (which I need for SyncBBDB).  Have you tried rebuilding the
earlier binaries from the last FC3 SRPM on your new FC4 installation
and using them?

If this gets too off-topic, I'll followup on the Bugzilla entry.

Alex

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux