On 01. 02. 22 14:25, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 01:41:01PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 02. 22 13:37, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi Miro,
Thanks for forwarding this announcement.
Apparently the talk about "improving communication between RHBZ and
the Fedora Project" has not born fruit yet. ;)
Well the announcement was public, I recommend subscribing to
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/bugzilla-announce-list if you
interact with bugzilla a lot.
Do we know if any of our tools and scripts that interact with RHBZ
will get broken by this?
I assume you have an eye on at least some of the releng scripts (FTI,
FTBFS, etc.).
I will check. I think it's all broken.
But what about fedora-review? fedora-create-review? The tool that
syncs assignees from dist-git to RHBZ?
No idea.
Most of these tools are written in python and as the email says, the most recent
version of python-bugzilla works fine (which is already in Fedora and EPEL -
stable).
So as long as your systems are up to date, it should be somewhat transparent.
I don't think this is is correct. If the python-bugzilla-powered script uses
username and password, it is still impacted.
The following files in the infra ansible repo seem to use it:
roles/fas_server/files/export-bugzilla
roles/distgit/pagure/templates/pagure-sync-bugzilla.py.j2
The following file uses it in the releng repo:
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs_weekly_reminder.py
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
