man, 27,.06.2005 kl. 08.06 -0400, skrev OmniUni: > I see the trademark difficulty. > > Perhaps "Lite Hat Linux" or something similar would work better? > Either way, I feel that in order to assure such features as > compatability, being up to date, and consistant quality, it is > important that whatever the project be called, it be closely developed > with fedora core. Though Cobind seems neat, and I will probably try > it, the combination of Nautilus+XFCE makes me somewhat nervous. I have > used gnome-panel with KDE, and Kicker with XFCE, but upon lauching > nautilus while working on my FC-LT package selection, I ended with > such a mess that it took no less than 20 minutes to sort out, and I > promptly "rpm -e"'d nautilus. > > Also note: I attempted to run GNOME on my dad's p3, 128MB/RAM, > computer last night. Kernel had to kill all processes to free up > memory. KDE was slow, but at least the kernel didn't have to get > involved. I'm afraid GNOME is definately not suited for lower end > computers, at least not yet. > Please be more specific with regards to what "attempted to run GNOME" really means. I'm writing this from Evolution with a 3 GB local mailstore and while not hugely pleasant it works at least. I've also got a terminal running and xchat along with the normal panel and nautilus. Applets: - cpu frequency monitor - battery monitor - gnome-dictionary - volume control - clock applet - Network Manager applet - tasklist - workspace switcher - notification area [kmaraas@localhost ~]$ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 125792 123460 2332 0 484 14304 -/+ buffers/cache: 108672 17120 Swap: 1048568 178912 869656 I guess I could easily free up some more memory if I went with a non-translucent panel and a fixed color background instead of this huge image I have there now. That and a slimmer evolution would make things absolutely workable IMO. All in all I was pleasantly surprised by this. I had expected much worse behaviour after reading your message ;-) Cheers Kjartan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list