On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 3:26 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 3. do not ignore already broken weak rich deps (partially reverts the change) > > This sounds like a possible path forward -- it would probably still be an > improvement over the the Fedora 35 status quo, however the results might be > quite surprising for the users. If we decide to do this, I think we should > postpone to Fedora 37 neverthelss to see it in action and figure out if it's > actually a good idea or an UX nightmare. Wouldn't that revert the primary reason why users wanted this features? I.e. "I have not installed weak dependency of package X on purpose, so I also don't want updates of package X to pull them in again"? It sounds like it's "not possible" to check whether weak dependencies were satisfied before a transaction (I wonder why? dnf has all the data here), but then, this feature is basically useless, and only breaks some behaviour in unexpected ways, unless I misunderstand something? Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
