On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 08:57 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > Sure :-) My mail wasn't really a complaint, I just tried to explain > to the majority of the people outside of Red Hat and who don't deal with > our internal system what is happening, and why. The fact that step 4 > is asynchronous to me is nearly unavoidable since it requires PGP signing > of the packages and "some" centralized manual checking is needed. Is there no way that the announcement (stage 4) be written ahead of time - ie with the push into stage 3 - with replaceable blocks for the information that will change (MD5s and the like). An automatic process would then fill in the blanks. Nigel. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
