Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Still the same fallout from that rage quit ...

I wouldn't mind taking adf-tribun-fonts (I already have two from that foundry), but I'm really wondering whether we should package fonts which no other package depends upon: It's easy for users to install them directly, packaged versions do not necessarily work better, there are no security fixes to care about, and unexpected font package updates can actually break documents (changed metrics). I may be arguing that I should drop my fonts packages, too ...
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux