Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:17:29PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> 
>> But yes, for Windows releases ≥ 95 OSR 2 and < 10 (and no, Windows version 
>> numbers are not anywhere near monotonic ;-) ), MSVCRT is included out of the 
>> box, UCRT is not. Is it really a good default to depend on a runtime library 
>> that is only included in Windows ≥ 10?
>
>  I've just checked, Windows 10 was released 7 years ago (Fedora 22
>timeframe).  We don't have to care about compatibility with so ancient
>releases.

Not Windows 95, sure, but the Windows world moves at a much slower pace
than Fedora, especially among non-technical users.  Windows 7 and 8 are
still out there.  Even XP.

That's why I consider the 32-bit MSVCRT binary the primary release of
my Windows software:  I can be sure it'll run on whatever ancient system 
it might end up on.

Ron
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux