Re: F37 Change: MinGW UCRT target (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For the record:

https://www.msys2.org/docs/environments/#msvcrt-vs-ucrt states:
> MSVCRT […] Works out of the box on every Microsoft Windows versions.

This is not entirely true. MSVCRT.DLL was introduced in Windows 95 OSR 2. 
The original Windows 95, with or without the only service pack released for 
it (SP1, because OSR 2 was not released as a service pack, only as an "OEM 
service release" for new computers), shipped only the even older CRTDLL.DLL 
(which MinGW stopped supporting years ago) out of the box, MSVCRT.DLL had to 
be installed through a redistributable (which was included with many 
applications including Microsoft Office, but it was not part of the 
operating system).

But yes, for Windows releases ≥ 95 OSR 2 and < 10 (and no, Windows version 
numbers are not anywhere near monotonic ;-) ), MSVCRT is included out of the 
box, UCRT is not. Is it really a good default to depend on a runtime library 
that is only included in Windows ≥ 10?

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux