Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 3:04 PM Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > ...and yet despite being so easy to review it somehow had a major
> > security vulnerability ever since it was written.
>
> This is not a good metric.  easy to review != was sufficiently reviewed,
> and getting sufficient code review might be the hardest problem in
> software engineering.
>
> Additionally, if a project has never had an issue, it's just as likely
> that no one has ever really looked at it than that it's "safer".
>

Actually, someone had conceived that it might be a problem in 2013:
https://ryiron.wordpress.com/2013/12/16/argv-silliness/



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux