Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > ...and yet despite being so easy to review it somehow had a major > security vulnerability ever since it was written. This is not a good metric. easy to review != was sufficiently reviewed, and getting sufficient code review might be the hardest problem in software engineering. Additionally, if a project has never had an issue, it's just as likely that no one has ever really looked at it than that it's "safer". Be well, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
