Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 06:53:01PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> This makes me wonder if we should (or do?) have a mechanism to remove
> a package which is not used.  "used" in the sense of being used by any
> account on the system, rather than in the dependency sense.  If we had
> that we'd only need to keep the background packages installed that
> some user has configured for their desktop.

Well, some users might want to be able to choose from all the
backgrounds, even if they are only using one when you look.

> But wouldn't it be possible to add Version: and Release: tags to each
> subpackage so those old version numbers don't change?  (I guess
> %{dist} would still be a problem though ...)

koji won't let you rebuild something thats already been built. 
You have to change the N-V-R with each build. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux