On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:08:25AM -0400, Paul A Houle wrote: > desktop systems in a deade. Linux 2.6 is ready, but is SELinux? It depends on what you are doing. With some floating-point intensive code running on a cluster of FC3 dual Opterons, I wasn't able to measure SELinux overhead in a reliable manner. It seemed to be lost in the noise and even less of a factor than differences in compilers. Eventually we decided to keep SELinux enabled, as the cluster is soon going to be running jobs on behalf of users. There's a good chance that the applications will end up using and relying on custom SELinux contexts and policies, especially if we can get rid of the few dependencies on Windows server machines that are left. Code that is more disk- and network-intensive should be of course result in different observations. -- Rudi -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
