Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 21:52 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > I already cited one upthread - openvswitch integration. And possibly
> > ifup-pre , I haven't found a NetworkManager equivalent to that
> > mechanism yet, but I might be missing it.
> 
> Do you mean /sbin/ifup-pre-local?  If so, is there a difference between
> that and NM's dispatcher pre-up?  I can't find any documentation about
> the semantics of ifup-pre-local (just that it was called near the end of
> the ifup script).

Hmm, yeah, looks like that may be equivalent indeed. Not sure why I
didn't find it before. Thanks for the pointer.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux