Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:19 PM Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/5/22 17:43, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> I'd say we want to get rid of both;)
> >
> > There are use-cases that NetworkManager just doesn't support that network-scripts
> > does. If network-scripts is orphaned I'll probably pick it up.
>
> Which use-cases are these?  Does systemd-networkd address them?

systemd-networkd has even *less* functionality than the legacy network-scripts.

I am, however, curious what functionality exists in network-scripts
that doesn't in NetworkManager, since most of the newer networking
features were only implemented in ifcfg-rh on NetworkManager.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux