Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > I see in this table that there are still a bunch of languages using > non-Noto fonts where there appears to be a Noto equivalent available, > e.g., https://fonts.google.com/noto shows me Devanagari, Bengali, and > Tamil on the first page whereas your table indicates that Lohit fonts will > continue to be used there. What is the reason for that? Are the Noto fonts > for those scripts incomplete? I think using Noto wherever possible would > lead to a more consistent experience. Another case is the math symbols: Should the default sans-serif math font be changed to Noto Sans Math? STIX is a serif font, so it probably makes sense to keep as the serif math font (also considering that there is, at least at this time, no Noto Serif Math). For cases where the distinction matters, see, e.g., the summation sign (clearly visible serifs), the integral sign (dots at the ends that are a form of serifs), or the partial derivative sign (constant stroke thickness in Noto Sans Math vs. variable in STIX). Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
