On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 10:12:20AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > say, not as I do' route. I would say we either need to drop FHS > > compliance or use an amended copy and work with the SuSE people on > > making that a shared standard. > > That's pretty much what has been going on. I've been working in > openSUSE for a few years now to rationalize the FHS configuration in > openSUSE to more closely match Fedora. As a result, today the only I'd be supportive of an effort to restart the FHS process with buy-in from openSUSE (and ideally Debian, Arch, FreeBSD...). And probably systemd too, from a plain pragmatic point of view. I think we'd want to either ask Linux Foundation to split it back from the LSB into its own thing — or else explicitly fork into a new standard. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
