On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 21:20, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:51:44AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> F36 but needs to be worked through the proper channels of 'upstream'. Get
> the FHS updated and fixed, work out that the change actually is going to be
Pretty sure that's a non-starter. FHS 3.0 was released in 2015, and the
whole thing has been effectively dead since.
I agree that the FHS and LSB are practically dead, but it is heavily used in our work. FHS compliance is one of the first things package reviews get dinged on
and it doesn't help if we start down the 'Do as I say, not as I do'
route. I would say we either need to drop FHS compliance or use an amended copy and work with the SuSE people on making that a shared standard.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
