Re: Any interest in ROCm packaging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:07:10PM -0000, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> 
> I think that'd be awesome -- and those internal clean-ups are really
> appreciated. Having the infrastructure there is nice, but I'm also curious:
> are there any application-level tools that are in Fedora Linux already or
> which could be packaged, to serve as a showcase for the technology?

Well I think OpenCL would be a good starting point since it's been around for a while and lots of applications use it.

Fedora already has some of the base components already (hsakmt, rocm-runtime, llvm). For OCL, fedora would just need:
- ROCm-Device-Libs (bitcode compiled by LLVM, needed to upgrade rocm-runtime to the latest version)
- ROCm-CompilerSupport (LLVM plugin, used for runtime compilation)
- ROCclr (a middle layer that does the generic compute work)
- ROCm-OpenCL-Runtime (the opencl frontend for rocclr)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux