On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 05:07:10PM -0000, Jeremy Newton wrote: > I see there's a few packages already, and I'm hoping to help with some > internal processes to make ROCm more distro friendly, such as better FHS > compliance, clearer licensing, etc. > > Anyone interested? I would be happy to try to help or review package requests :) I think that'd be awesome -- and those internal clean-ups are really appreciated. Having the infrastructure there is nice, but I'm also curious: are there any application-level tools that are in Fedora Linux already or which could be packaged, to serve as a showcase for the technology? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
