On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 10:41:31AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 08/12/2021 09:33, Dan Horák wrote: > >On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 08:32:10 +0100 > >>>zxing-cpp.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error 1 > >>>zxing-cpp.x86_64: E: invalid-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libZXing.so.1.2.0 libZXing.so.1.2.0 > >>>=================== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings, 2 badness; has taken 2.5 s =================== > > > >[dan@t460 ~]$ rpmlint -I shlib-policy-name-error > >shlib-policy-name-error: > > > >so yes, this needs further explanation :-) > > Ah, rpmlint-2.1.0-5.fc35.noarch apparently has some -e option instead of an > -I option now (it doesn't appear to have a man page, though): > > >$ rpmlint -e shlib-policy-name-error > >shlib-policy-name-error: > >The package contains shared library but is not named after its SONAME. > > So the proposed package would presumably better be named libZXing rather > than zxing-cpp. The package could be also called just 'zxing' if we are expect that the original non-c++ project will never be imported into fedora. It doesn't really matter, 'zxing-cpp' matches the upstream name and is just fine. Whatever you do, please don't add an uppercase letter in the package name ;) Sometimes rpmlint output should just be ignored, and this seems to be one of those cases. > >[dan@t460 ~]$ rpmlint -I invalid-ldconfig-symlink > >invalid-ldconfig-symlink: > >The symbolic link references the wrong file. It should reference the > >shared library. > > ...which still leaves it unclear which symbolic link is allegedly wrong, > because the libraries and symlinks contained in the rpm look just fine: > > >$ ls -l usr/lib64/ > >total 1204 > >lrwxrwxrwx. 1 sbergman sbergman 17 Dec 7 16:26 libZXing.so.1 -> libZXing.so.1.2.0 > >-rwxr-xr-x. 1 sbergman sbergman 1229720 Dec 7 16:26 libZXing.so.1.2.0 Yeah, it looks fine to me too. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
