Re: rpm bug for multiple README.md or LICENSE.md in EPEL 8 and Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 11:21 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The thing is, the path stripping of %doc path/to/README is a feature. The
> directory path in the sources is not necessarily useful to replicate in the
> installed documentation directory. Removing that path stripping would be an
> incompatible change and make the doc directories of some packages a mess of
> unnecessary subdirectories. If desired, this needs a new syntax that does
> not clash with existing usage.
>
>         Kevin Kofler

A binary '__doc_path_stripping' flag, set to "true" by default, might
serve to preserve the paths and avoid overlaps if and as desired. I'd
agree that changing default behavior should be unwelcome.

This path stripping behavior is not mentioned in the RPM
documentation, though people may have become accustomed to it. And
"not necessarily useful" does not mean "never useful", as we are
seeing right now.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux