On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:15 PM Davide Cavalca <dcavalca@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 19:10 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021, 5:33 PM Davide Cavalca via devel > > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Correct, XFS doesn't support fs-verity at the moment (though it > > > could > > > be implemented if one wanted to). > > > > That means it would exclude Fedora Server and ELN as they are XFS > > based. > > There isn't any impact on XFS-based editions by default. Building and > signing RPMs with fs-verity works fine, as there's no filesystem > dependency for that. Installing RPMs also works fine, with one caveat: > if you're running a system with an unsupported filesystem and have rpm- > plugin-fsverity (which is not installed by default), fs-verity will not > be enabled for the installed files so there will be no verification > (but the RPM installation itself should succeed). Yes, thank you. I meant it would render those Editions/projects unable to use this Change. It's not the end of the world, just an observation. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
