Re: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 19:10 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021, 5:33 PM Davide Cavalca via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Correct, XFS doesn't support fs-verity at the moment (though it
> > could
> > be implemented if one wanted to).
> 
> That means it would exclude Fedora Server and ELN as they are XFS
> based.

There isn't any impact on XFS-based editions by default. Building and
signing RPMs with fs-verity works fine, as there's no filesystem
dependency for that. Installing RPMs also works fine, with one caveat:
if you're running a system with an unsupported filesystem and have rpm-
plugin-fsverity (which is not installed by default), fs-verity will not
be enabled for the installed files so there will be no verification
(but the RPM installation itself should succeed).

Cheers
Davide
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux