Re: F36 Change: Enable fs-verity in RPM (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2021-12-02 at 15:08 -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> 
> > === Relationship with IMA ===
> > 
> > [https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-ima/wiki/Home/ IMA] is another
> > technology meant to provide detection of file alterations. IMA and
> > fsverity operate very differently, and are somewhat complementary.
> > [...]
> 
> Do these two systems use the same per-file signature metadata in the
> RPMs?

Both fs-verity and IMA use file signatures, but they each have their
own dedicated flags and signing flows in RPM (e.g. see
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/4afe2d14d33db82ccb41c0a8d5eb1a4db90762fc/rpmsign.c
for the signing implementation). The signatures themselves are not
interchangeable -- fs-verity's signature is based off the Merkle tree
(which itself is block-based), while IMA measures the file as a whole.

Cheers
Davide
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux