On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:53:54PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > coordinate their work. Even if you spend your time working solely > upstream, src-git still ultimately goes through dist-git via PackIt as > would existing package maintenance. dist-git therefore is the > authoritative source of what is in Fedora. This is probably going to get lost in what might become a mega-thread, but I'll try to stick this in here while I still can. :) This actually reminds me that it might be worth pointing out a distinction. That is: src.fedoraproject.org is not dist-git. It's a Pagure front-end over dist-git. And it is Pagure and the associated UI bits that are worrying me the most. In a theoretical situation where we would move src.fedoraproject.org to gitlab.com — or where we move _everything_ to source git — we could _still_ have an completely open source, in house, in our datacenter `dist-git`. Just without a complex web front-end. I don't know if that at that level matters to anyone for whom this is so deeply fundamental. And I'm not going to split hairs or claim that this is what Fedora Council meant all along or anything tricky like that. Just that... if ownership of this underlying fundamental truth is the thing that is _really_ essential here, we _can_ have that and also eat our cake. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
