Re: Non-responsive maintainer: sjenning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/11/2021 03:55, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
(Eventually) going down the pam-u2f upgrade
process was on my infinitely countable TODO
list for some time.  Thanks for raising it!

I am also willing to be a (co)-maintainer for pam-u2f
if needed/necessary/desired (I am the maintainer for
what will end up being a new dependency with a
recent pam-u2f, i.e. libfido2).

As I recall, upgrading pam-u2f to a recent release
would allow orphaning/removing of a couple of the
dependencies (libu2f-server/client).
That is correct! They should be pretty much useless after upgrading pam-u2f.

Seth has replied to the bugzilla bug, we'll see what he decides. I think it's definitely useful for you to be at least a co-maintainer, since pam-u2f depends on libfido2. I will be using pam-u2f for probably a very long time, so I wouldn't mind co-maintaining both if you would like some help.

Relevant docs: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_encouraging_comaintainers_of_packages

Arthur

On 19/11/2021 03:55, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:10 PM Arthur Bols <arthur@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone know if Seth Jennings (sjenning) is stil active in Fedora? I
sent him an email in June without response.
The package pam-u2f has been outdated for a while and I've created the
non-responsive maintainer bug [1]. There is also a bug open for pyscard [2].

Please ping me on irc (principis) or reply to this email if anyone knows
anything. I'm would like to maintain pam-u2f if needed.
(Eventually) going down the pam-u2f upgrade
process was on my infinitely countable TODO
list for some time.  Thanks for raising it!

I am also willing to be a (co)-maintainer for pam-u2f
if needed/necessary/desired (I am the maintainer for
what will end up being a new dependency with a
recent pam-u2f, i.e. libfido2).

As I recall, upgrading pam-u2f to a recent release
would allow orphaning/removing of a couple of the
dependencies (libu2f-server/client).

FWIW, I have been building (recent) pam-u2f
versions in copr for my own use for a while now
(so I even have a recently valid spec file should
one want).

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux