On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 2:41 PM Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 11/18/21 10:15 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:27 PM Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 11/17/21 2:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> And not 'in fedora', but people always bring up steam when these > >>> disccussions happen. I wonder why they are sticking with 32bit? > >> > >> Is that just for the steam client, or also for its many legacy games? > >> ISTR it provides its own platform libraries for games, only relying on > >> system libs for stuff like mesa, but I'm not sure how the rpm is really > >> packaged. Personally, I've moved to the flatpak. > > > > All of it is 32-bit (client, games, runtime). Steam also offers a > > 64-bit runtime, but not many games I own use it. > > Sure, but with a private runtime they can run whatever 32-bit code they > want, as long as our kernel has CONFIG_COMPAT_32=y. But I'm wondering > how much of Fedora's 32-bit userspace is used by that stuff. > > The question "why they are sticking with 32bit?" is easily answered for > games, because they simply aren't under active development. That doesn't > mean we're still providing libraries for all of those. > I usually gut the Steam runtime and have it use the Fedora libraries, since they're *better* in a lot of cases. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
