Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Kevin Kofler via devel:

> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Eventually, we'll have to fix the Fedora packages if there's no upstream
>> release with the fixes.
>
> We just have to add -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration to the build 
> flags of the offending packages (same as for format-security).

For some packages, that is unfortunately more difficult than fixing the
actual source of the incompatibility.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux