On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 06:51:23PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Aleksei Bavshin:
On 11/4/21 09:17, Florian Weimer wrote:
Why is this VERIFY? The patch was generated as if by “git show”, and I
do not see anything wrong with it.
rpminspect thinks that the patch is suspiciously large and asks you to
confirm that it is intentional.
There's a test description in the beginning of the log:
Inspects all patches defined in the spec file and reports changes
between builds. At the INFO level, rpminspect reports diffstat(1) and
patch size changes. If thresholds are reached regarding a change in
the patch size or the number of files the patch touches, rpminspect
reports the change at the VERIFY level unless the comparison is for a
rebase. The configuration file can also list patch names that
rpminspect should ignore during the inspection.
Is this a new check? It was flagged as a regression in Jenkins.
It´s not new, the patches inspection has been present for a while.
Thanks,
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
