* Aleksei Bavshin: > On 11/4/21 09:17, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Why is this VERIFY? The patch was generated as if by “git show”, and I >> do not see anything wrong with it. > > rpminspect thinks that the patch is suspiciously large and asks you to > confirm that it is intentional. > > There's a test description in the beginning of the log: > > Inspects all patches defined in the spec file and reports changes > between builds. At the INFO level, rpminspect reports diffstat(1) and > patch size changes. If thresholds are reached regarding a change in > the patch size or the number of files the patch touches, rpminspect > reports the change at the VERIFY level unless the comparison is for a > rebase. The configuration file can also list patch names that > rpminspect should ignore during the inspection. Is this a new check? It was flagged as a regression in Jenkins. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
