Hello,
On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 10:00:05 AM EDT David Sastre wrote:
> I assume that the people who worked on it looked into various different
> possibilities for its implementation and decide on the current one, but I
> have a few questions:
>
> - Since there are people concerned about the increased size of the
> binary, and since none of the fields are mandatory, would it be
> beneficial to use a package URL (PURL[1]) instead? That way, a few bytes
> can be saved (a few values are included in the same key).
>
> E.g.
>
> {
> "type":"rpm",
> "os":"fedora",
> "osVersion":"33",
> "name":"coreutils",
> "version":"4711.0815.fc13",
> "architecture":"arm32",
> "osCpe": "cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:33",
> "debugInfoUrl": "https://debuginfod.fedoraproject.org/"}
I keep seeing mention of architecture in this discussion. Isn't arch
available as the e_machine member of the elf header?
Cheers,
-Steve
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
