On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 7:29 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:32 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5 > > > > > > == Summary == > > > > > > The ansible project has re-organized how they release and distribute > > > ansible. This change moves Fedora to be in sync with those changes and > > > retires the old 'ansible classic/2.9.x' package in favor of a > > > 'ansible' package that pulls in ansible-core (the engine) and includes > > > all the collections in upstream ansible releases. > > > > I wrote to the various upstream bugtrackers about this already. The > > re-org upstream is confusing and unwelcome, and creates a stack of > > problems. Yeah, it's been confusing to people for sure, but it does also help out a lot with other problems. :( > > I would publish ansible-core as just that, with a "Provides: ansible > > %{version{-%{release}" and even "Obsoletes: ansible >= %{version}". That would radically diverge from upstream and cause _more_ confusion. It's unfortunate that the 'ansible' name meaning has changed, but ignoring it or overriding the upstream name isn't going to help matters. > > The new pypi.org tarball published as "ansible" isn't. It's a tarball > > of components from the Ansible galaxy collection, and it is > > unnecessary for the basic ansible-core operation, which are much > > bulkier than the previous "ansible" and contains approximately 145 > > distinct software licenses. That.... is a sign of a packaging problem > > that I've discussed on the pypi.org issues pages, at > > I realize I was unclear. The new "ansible" tarball from pypi.org has > 145 distinct software licenses, and many distinct galaxy collection > published ansible modules. The new "ansible-core" tarball is much > smaller, even smaller than the old "ansible" package due to some bulky > modules being transferred to the galaxy collection. Right. > Splitting off the variety of add-on modules makes sense. Replacing the > core package with the add-on modules and moving aside the core seems > exactly backwards. Well, I think the thought was that people would find ansible-core too bare bones after having used ansible-2.9/classic with all it's included modules. If you don't want the collections, just install ansible-core. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
