I'm doing a review of a MinGW build of a Qt 6 package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214 During the license check portion of the review, I have become increasingly convinced that our qt5-* and qt6-* packages have incorrect License fields. Currently they have "LGPLv2 with exceptions or GPLv3 with exceptions". I believe that most or all of them should have one of these two instead: - LGPLv3 or GPLv2+ - LGPLv3 or GPLv2+ with exceptions Could one or two of you license-minded people read through the comments on that bug and indicate whether you think the analysis is correct or not, please? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
