Re: Strange soversion checks in rpmlint 2.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> By the way, SOVERSION can consist of more than one digit. It can be
> 0.5.2 and this is not an error:
> https://autotools.io/libtool/version.html

Other build systems such as CMake are even more flexible than libtool and 
allow arbitrary combinations of major version and full version, including:
* non-numeric characters (e.g., you can have a version of .0.fedora.1),
* the major version (the one encoded in the SONAME) not being a prefix or 
even a substring of the full version (the one encoded in the name of the 
regular, non-symlink file), e.g., a major version of .3 for a full version 
of .1.2.0.

Rpmlint should really not complain about these.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux