Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by >> > people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a >> > light weight system which is simple to set up [...] >> >> For those people who like simple to set up and working systems but are >> willing to consider upgrading if it's also simple and will keep working, >> is there a NIS->$whatever migration document in fedora someplace? > > I don't think anyone has come up with an agreed upon $whatever that a > majority of people like. There is LDAP but that isn't light. There are > kerberos but that isn't easy. "light" in terms of CPU/network, who cares. "light" in terms of simplicity and maintenance, you have my attention. If there is no such gadget available, then please let's keep NIS around. > And honestly the cool kids only want web logins these days as servers > are a pain and why not just login into Google/Facebook/Microsoft and > let them deal with all that setup. (OK but seriously that's not a fedora matter. Well, or rather, I'd love to have a passwd/nss backed openid gadget. Is that ipsilon?) - FChE _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure