On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:42 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 29/09/2021 22:23, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > 1. The two schemes actually order properly. Should I increment the epoch anyway? > > No. 2021.09.0+351 is higher than 1.4.1717: > > $ rpmdev-vercmp 2021.09.0+351 1.4.1717 > 2021.09.0+351 > 1.4.1717 > > > 2. What should I do with that +351? Do we have a policy about the "+"? > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_handling_non_sorting_versions_with_tilde_dot_and_caret > "+" is fine, it's just treated the same as a "." in RPM. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
