* Kevin Kofler via devel: > Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Kevin Kofler via devel: >> >>> (And for the record, I also think that Go and Rust should not work >>> that way either! It is possible to build shared libraries of Go code, >>> at least one Go toolchain supports it.) >> >> There is no stable Go ABI. Even minor updates change ABI because type >> sizes and struct offsets change and are inlined across shared object >> boundaries. You have to rebuild all reverse dependencies to avoid ABI >> mismatches. Go's compatibility guarantees only apply at the source >> level and do not preclude the addition of new struct fields, for >> example. > > The same goes for OCaml and yet we still manage to ship almost everything in > OCaml dynamically linked. Interesting. Could you provide an example of such a dynamically linked binary? Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
