Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:36 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:11 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 20 2021 at 02:43:20 PM +0200, Fabio Valentini
> > > <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > As usual, I'm asking: Is it OK for me to fix obvious oversights, such
> > > > as "package was built successfully, it just needs to be submitted to
> > > > bodhi" or "packager obviously only forgot to merge a change to f35 and
> > > > build it there as well"? That should resolve ~55 of the total of ~120
> > > > "real" downgrade issues.
> > >
> > > Hi, I'd say if you're a provenpackager, then please do. Why not?
> > >
> > > As usual, nice investigation. Thanks!
> >
> > Alright, I've fixed issues for all packages where the fix was obvious.
>
> Awesome. :)
>
> > The next Fedora 35 updates-testing compose should have all updates, so
> > that should be in time for things to be in order by the time the beta
> > freeze lifts.
> >
> > This leaves the following packages that might need attention:
> >
> > - conmon: looks like rhcontainerbot is at it again
> > - glusterfs-selinux: mangled changelog, bungled update?
> > - gstreamer1*: versioning snafu in f34 (should resolve itself with the
> > next f35 update)
> > - lutris: updated only for stable branches, but not for f35+ (?)
> > - nodepool: updated only for stable branches, but not for f35+ (?),
> > might be a zuul issue?
> > - notcurses: looks like package maintainer is waiting for beta freeze to lift?
> > - toolbox: package history undecipherable to me, but the latest ^4
> > snapshot build is missing from f35 regardless
>
> I thought that was container only? or there's a package too?
>
> > - every package that switched to rpmautospec without checking for
> > mononotincally increasing NVR :(
>
> Can we identify all these?
>
> > Should I file bugs for those components?
>
> Please do!

Here's the bugs I filed:

conmon: version downgrade from f34 -> f35, updates stuck in bodhi
(looks like ignored gating results / rhcontainerbot fallout, again)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007221

glusterfs-selinux: mangled changelog and NVR downgrade from f34 -> f35
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007220

lutris: missing update to 0.5.8.4 in fedora 35 and in rawhide
(also uploaded .src.rpm files in the lookaside cache ...)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007226

nodepool: update to version 3.13.1 missing from Fedora 35 and rawhide
(seems to have been caused by a zuul PR oops, which was then forgotten about)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007227

toolbox: versioning mistakes, version downgrade from f34 -> f35,
updates stuck in bodhi
(users on neither fedora 34 nor 35 will get the latest version due to
versioning mistakes (e.g. using ^ instead of ~) and missing / stuck in
gating builds on Fedora 35)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007242

Some other packages should get resolved once the beta freeze is lifted
and updates-testing contents are finally pushed to stable.
I'll run the repository content analysis again at that point.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux