Re: Naming convention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Dominik Mierzejewski:

> On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I need to
>> add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a
>> different name. Currently, there are in fedora autoconf, autoconf213, and
>> autoconf268. The latest version is 2.71 so I have few options in my mind:
>> 
>>    - compat-autoconf
>>    - compat-autoconf27
>>    - autoconf27
>> 
>> What do you think?
>
> The last one is almost the currently recommended convention. The correct
> name would be "autoconf2.7":
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple

Shouldn't it be autoconf2.71, assuming that it is for autoconf 2.71?

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux