On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16. 09. 21 22:03, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:02 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 16. 09. 21 21:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >>> For exmple, if I remember correctly, mozilla-openh264 / gstreamer > >>> support for it are installed as weak dependencies with post-GA package > >>> updates. > >> > >> Why exactly is this a problem? > >> > > > > Because it will not happen anymore. We need a new way to trigger its > > installation post-install. > > Oh. We don't have them installed on the media, but we want them to be pulled in > on upgrades? Is there some legal requirement that forbids us to have them > installed by default directly? > Yes. The patent license for H.264 (AVC) for use with OpenH264 is only conveyed when distributed by Cisco, which we do through the RPM repository hosted by them. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
